Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Statistical Hypotheses and Error

Hypotheses

image 86
  • Null hypothesis (H0)
    • hypothesis of no difference
      • e.g., there is no link between disease and risk factor
  • Alternative hypothesis (H1)
    • hypothesis of difference
  •  e.g., there is a link between disease and risk factor

Type I Error (False Positive)

  • Stating there is an association when none exits
    • incorrectly rejecting null hypothesis
  • α = probability of type I error 
  • p = probability that results as or more extreme than those of the study would be observed if the null hypothesis were true  
  • general rule of thumb is that statistical significance is reached if p < 0.05

Type II Error (False Negative)

  • Stating there is no effect when an effect exists 
    • incorrectly accepting null hypothesis 
  • β = probability of type II error 

Power (True Positive)

  • Probability of correctly rejecting null hypothesis 
    • power = 1 – β 
  • Power depends on
    • sample size
      • increasing sample size increases power 
    • size of expected effect
  • increasing effect size increases power

True Negative

  • Probability of correctly accepting null hypothesis

Confidence Interval

  • Range of values associated with a confidence level indicating the likelihood that the true population value of a parameter falls within that range
    • usually done with 95% confidence interval (2 standard deviations from the mean)
    • e.g., based on our study data, we are 95% confident that the average salary of a teacher lies between $30,000-45,000/year
  • Confidence interval is calculated from statistics generated from the studied data
  • Smaller confidence intervals suggest better precision of the data
  • Larger confidence intervals suggest less precision of the data
  • If confidence intervals of 2 groups overlap, there is no statistically significant difference

A Priori Versus Post Hoc Analysis

  • A priori comparisons
    • comparisons planned prior to data analysis
    • planning dependent on knowledge researchers have prior to conducting statistical tests 
  • Post hoc analysis
    • researcher decides additional comparisons to make after viewing data
    • choices dependent on knowledge researchers have gained after conducting statistical tests 
      • e.g., a test is run that says there is a difference between groups A, B, and C
        • post hoc analysis would involve comparing group A to group B, B to C, and A to C to see between which groups the difference lies 
      • one potential hazard is an increased likelihood of spurious statistical associations